Quadro RTX 8100 vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1146not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.35no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1GA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9610752
Core clock speed320 MHzno data
Boost clock speed600 MHz1860 MHz
Number of transistors189 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200625.0
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS40 TFLOPS
ROPs2112
TMUs12336

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data313 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared16 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data768.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 350 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has 5733% lower power consumption.

RTX 8100, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and Quadro RTX 8100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 8100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 456 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or Quadro RTX 8100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.