Arctic Sound 2T vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1136not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.29no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1Arctic Sound
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2015 (10 years ago)2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores967680 ×2
Core clock speed320 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200216.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS13.82 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs2120 ×2
TMUs12240 ×2
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.23 TB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 500 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has 8233.3% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound 2T, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and Arctic Sound 2T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook graphics card while Arctic Sound 2T is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
Arctic Sound 2T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 445 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 2T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or Arctic Sound 2T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.