Radeon RX Vega 28 Mobile vs HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1322not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 8 (2015−2016)no data
GPU code nameBraswellno data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2016 (10 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12no data
Core clock speed320 MHzno data
Boost clock speed640 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nmno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus width64/128 Bitno data
Shared memory+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2no data

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) and Radeon RX Vega 28 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 260 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 28 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) or Radeon RX Vega 28 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.