ATI Radeon DDR VIVO SE vs HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1322not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 8 (2015−2016)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameBraswellRage 6
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2016 (10 years ago)14 August 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12no data
Core clock speed320 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm180 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.098
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataFloppy

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data183 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5.856 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.27.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2016 14 August 2001
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm

HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) and Radeon DDR VIVO SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon DDR VIVO SE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 260 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon DDR VIVO SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) or Radeon DDR VIVO SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.