Matrox G550 vs HD Graphics 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1266not rated
Place by popularity99not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)G500 (2001−2005)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT2+Condor
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2011 (15 years ago)1 January 2001 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed650 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,160 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate15.600.25
Floating-point processing power0.2496 TFLOPSno data
ROPs22
TMUs122

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 4x
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared332 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)8.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.11.5
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2011 1 January 2001
Chip lithography 32 nm 180 nm

HD Graphics 3000 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 463% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 3000 and Matrox G550. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook graphics card while Matrox G550 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 2903 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Matrox G550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 3000 or Matrox G550, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.