Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs HD Graphics 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 3000 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 3000
2011
0.66

Iris Xe MAX Graphics outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 1632% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1147387
Place by popularity89not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)Gen. 12 Xe (2020)
GPU code nameSandy BridgeiDG1LPDEV
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)31 October 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$476 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1296
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors995 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown25 Watt
Texture fill rate13.8079.20
Floating-point performance20.4 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 3000 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR4x
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared4266 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data68.26 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 3000 0.66
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 11.43
+1632%

Iris Xe MAX Graphics outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 1632% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 3000 254
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 1971
+676%

Iris Xe MAX Graphics outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 676% in Passmark.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD Graphics 3000 2503
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 36993
+1378%

Iris Xe MAX Graphics outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 1378% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−225%
26
+225%
1440p1−2
−1900%
20
+1900%
4K0−117

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%
Hitman 3 1−2
−2300%
24
+2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−2300%
48
+2300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−1850%
39
+1850%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%
Hitman 3 0−1 12
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−2250%
45−50
+2250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−3200%
33
+3200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−3300%
34
+3300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−2500%
26
+2500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−2800%
29
+2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1700%
18
+1700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 14−16
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 6−7
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Hitman 3 0−1 14−16
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%

4K
High Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 12−14

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 7−8
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 12−14
Metro Exodus 0−1 10−12

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 10−12

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1800%
19
+1800%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1800%
57
+1800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−3200%
33
+3200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 6
Battlefield 5 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−3200%
33
+3200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2900%
30
+2900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2400%
25
+2400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 10−12
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 8−9
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−1900%
20
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 10−12
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 6−7

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 10−12
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 8−9
Hitman 3 0−1 7−8
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 6−7
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 11

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 5−6
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 5−6
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 0−1 6−7
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 14−16
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 4−5

This is how HD Graphics 3000 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 225% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 1900% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 11.43
Recency 1 February 2011 31 October 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 2219 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 226 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.