GeForce GTX 285 X2 vs HD Graphics 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1264not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT2+GT200B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2011 (15 years ago)17 June 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96240 ×2
Core clock speed650 MHz648 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,160 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown315 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6051.84 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.2496 TFLOPS0.7085 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs232 ×2
TMUs1280 ×2
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data275 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1152 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data147.5 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2011 17 June 2009
Chip lithography 32 nm 55 nm

HD Graphics 3000 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 71.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 3000 and GeForce GTX 285 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 285 X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 X2
GeForce GTX 285 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 2876 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 285 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 3000 or GeForce GTX 285 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.