ATI Radeon 9250 vs HD Graphics 2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11881541
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1RV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2012 (12 years ago)1 March 2004 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed650 MHz240 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate6.9000.96
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPSno data
ROPs14
TMUs64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.01.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.80N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
Metro Exodus 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 4−5 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2012 1 March 2004
Chip lithography 22 nm 150 nm

HD Graphics 2500 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 581.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 2500 and Radeon 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 2500
ATI Radeon 9250
Radeon 9250

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1467 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 54 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 2500 or Radeon 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.