Data Center GPU Max NEXT vs HD Graphics 2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1179not rated
Place by popularity97not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2011−2012)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1Rialto Bridge
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2012 (12 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores620480
Core clock speed650 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors392 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown800 Watt
Texture fill rate6.9002,048
Floating-point performance0.1104 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno dataOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data3.1 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data3,205 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.80N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm

Data Center GPU Max NEXT has a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 2500 and Data Center GPU Max NEXT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2500 is a notebook card while Data Center GPU Max NEXT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 2500
Intel Data Center GPU Max NEXT
Data Center GPU Max NEXT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1270 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 45 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max NEXT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.