Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 vs HD Graphics 2000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1216not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT1NV5 B6
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)22 March 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed850 MHz100 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate8.1000.2
Floating-point processing power0.1296 TFLOPSno data
ROPs12
TMUs62

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared133 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.064 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)6.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.11.2
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2011 22 March 1999
Chip lithography 32 nm 250 nm

HD Graphics 2000 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 681.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 2000 and Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2000 is a notebook card while Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000
NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1323 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 25 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.