AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo) vs Intel HD Graphics 2000

#ad
Buy
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated873
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameSandy BridgeCarrizo
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years old)4 June 2015 (8 years old)
Current price$318 no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6256
Core clock speed850/1100 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1350 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors189 million2410 Million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown12-35 Watt
Texture fill rate8.100no data
Floating-point performance10.2 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 2000 and Radeon R5 (Carrizo) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/Ano data

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 1 February 2011 4 June 2015
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 2000 and Radeon R5 (Carrizo). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
Radeon R5 (Carrizo)

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1029 votes

Rate Intel HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.