Quadro NVS 280 SD vs HD Graphics 2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12911610
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT1NV18 C1
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2011 (15 years ago)31 May 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed850 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown10 Watt
Texture fill rate8.1001.000
Floating-point processing power0.1296 TFLOPSno data
ROPs12
TMUs64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)8.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.11.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 2000 213
+10550%
Samples: 1
NVS 280 SD 2
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
Metro Exodus 0−1 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 no data

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 3−4 no data

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2011 31 May 2005
Chip lithography 32 nm 150 nm

HD Graphics 2000 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 369% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 2000 and Quadro NVS 280 SD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2000 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro NVS 280 SD is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1492 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Quadro NVS 280 SD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 2000 or Quadro NVS 280 SD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.