FirePro M3100 vs HD Graphics 2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1291not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT1Mars
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2011 (15 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48384
Core clock speed850 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors189 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate8.10016.80
Floating-point processing power0.1296 TFLOPSno data
ROPs18
TMUs624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.16.5 (5.1)
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm

FirePro M3100 has a 14% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 2000 and FirePro M3100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2000 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M3100 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1487 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate FirePro M3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 2000 or FirePro M3100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.