Radeon RX 7400 vs HD Graphics 12EU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data51.15
ArchitectureGeneration 5.75 (2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameIronlakeNavi 33
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 January 2010 (15 years ago)8 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961792
Core clock speed533 MHz1452 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2300 MHz
Number of transistors177 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate6.396257.6
Floating-point processing power0.1023 TFLOPS16.49 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs12112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceQPIPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2010 8 August 2025
Chip lithography 45 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 43 Watt

HD Graphics 12EU has 22.9% lower power consumption.

RX 7400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 12EU and Radeon RX 7400. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 12EU
HD Graphics 12EU
AMD Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 18 votes

Rate HD Graphics 12EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 23 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 12EU or Radeon RX 7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.