Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs H800 SXM5

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureHopper (2022−2023)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGH100Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores168964
Core clock speed1095 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1755 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors80,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)700 Wattno data
Texture fill rate926.6no data
Floating-point processing power59.3 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs528no data
Tensor Cores528no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16no data
WidthSXM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM3no data
Maximum RAM amount80 GBno data
Memory bus width5120 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1313 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth1,681 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12_2
Shader ModelN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data
OpenCL3.0no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA9.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2023 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm

H800 SXM5 has a 25% more advanced lithography process.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.

We couldn't decide between H800 SXM5 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that H800 SXM5 is a workstation card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA H800 SXM5
H800 SXM5
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate H800 SXM5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.