Radeon Vega 11 Embedded vs ATI Graphics Xpression

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameMach64Raven
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 November 1995 (30 years ago)13 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data704
Core clock speed40 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors1 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology600 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data57.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.83 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUsno data44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIIGP
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeEDOSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed40 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth320.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 1995 13 February 2018
Chip lithography 600 nm 14 nm

Vega 11 Embedded has an age advantage of 22 years, and a 4185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Xpression and Radeon Vega 11 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Graphics Xpression
Graphics Xpression
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
Radeon Vega 11 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Graphics Xpression on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 22 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Xpression or Radeon Vega 11 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.