GMA 950 vs ATI Graphics Xpression ISA

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Generation 3.5 (2005)
GPU code nameMach64Lakeport
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1995 (30 years ago)1 May 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed40 MHz166 MHz
Number of transistors1 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology600 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data7 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.66
ROPs11
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDRAMSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed40 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth320.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A9.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLN/A2.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 600 nm 90 nm

GMA 950 has a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Xpression ISA and GMA 950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Xpression ISA is a desktop graphics card while GMA 950 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Graphics Xpression ISA
Graphics Xpression ISA
Intel GMA 950
GMA 950

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Graphics Xpression ISA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 183 votes

Rate GMA 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Xpression ISA or GMA 950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.