Arctic Sound-M vs ATI Graphics Wonder PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameMach32Arctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1992 (34 years ago)2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8192
Core clock speed10 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology700 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data500 Watt
Texture fill rateno data230.4
Floating-point processing powerno data14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs1128
TMUsno data256
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDRAMHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 MB/s1.23 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 700 nm 10 nm

Arctic Sound-M has a 1638300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 6900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Wonder PCI and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Wonder PCI is a desktop graphics card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Graphics Wonder PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Wonder PCI or Arctic Sound-M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.