Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile vs ATI Graphics Ultra +

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameMach32Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 January 1992 (34 years ago)4 May 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed10 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Manufacturing process technology800 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data33.60
Floating-point processing powerno data1.075 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIRing Bus
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDRAMSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed10 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 1992 4 May 2020
Chip lithography 800 nm 10 nm

Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile has an age advantage of 28 years, and a 7900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra + and Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Ultra + is a desktop graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Graphics Ultra +
Graphics Ultra +
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile
Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 37 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra + or Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.