GeForce FX 5800 vs ATI Graphics Ultra +

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameMach32NV30
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 January 1992 (34 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed10 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistorsno data125 million
Manufacturing process technology800 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data44 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.200
ROPs14
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIAGP 8x
Lengthno data213 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDRAMDDR
Maximum RAM amount1 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone9.0a
OpenGLNone1.5 (2.1)
OpenCLNoneN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 1992 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 800 nm 130 nm

FX 5800 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 515.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra + and GeForce FX 5800. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Graphics Ultra +
Graphics Ultra +
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800
GeForce FX 5800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 27 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra + or GeForce FX 5800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.