Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated8
Place by popularitynot in top-10061
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.64
Power efficiencyno data15.81
Architectureno dataRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameMach32Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 January 1993 (31 year ago)3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6144
Core clock speed10 MHz1929 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2498 MHz
Number of transistorsno data57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology800 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data355 Watt
Texture fill rateno data959.2
Floating-point processing powerno data61.39 TFLOPS
ROPs1192
TMUsno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceVLBPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data287 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 MB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 1993 3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 800 nm 5 nm

RX 7900 XTX has an age advantage of 29 years, a 2457500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 15900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro and Radeon RX 7900 XTX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Graphics Ultra Pro
Graphics Ultra Pro
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3552 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.