RTX A4000 Max-Q vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameMach32GA104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 January 1993 (33 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5120
Core clock speed10 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1395 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology800 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data80 Watt
Texture fill rateno data223.2
Floating-point processing powerno data14.28 TFLOPS
ROPs180
TMUsno data160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data5 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceVLBPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/s352.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 1993 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 800 nm 8 nm

RTX A4000 Max-Q has an age advantage of 28 years, a 819100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 9900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro and RTX A4000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Ultra Pro is a desktop graphics card while RTX A4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Graphics Ultra Pro
Graphics Ultra Pro
NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q
RTX A4000 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate RTX A4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra Pro or RTX A4000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.