RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.03
Power efficiencyno data45.18
Architectureno dataAda Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameMach32AD107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 January 1993 (33 years ago)12 February 2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2816
Core clock speed10 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2130 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology800 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data187.4
Floating-point processing powerno data12 TFLOPS
ROPs148
TMUsno data88
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22
L1 Cacheno data2.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceVLBPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/s256.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 1993 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 800 nm 5 nm

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has an age advantage of 31 years, a 1638300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 15900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro and RTX 2000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Ultra Pro is a desktop graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 98 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra Pro or RTX 2000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.