Quadro Plex 2100 S4 vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataTesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameMach32G80
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 January 1993 (33 years ago)25 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128 ×4
Core clock speed10 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data681 million
Manufacturing process technology800 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data640 Watt
Texture fill rateno data38.40 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3456 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs124 ×4
TMUsno data32 ×4
L2 Cacheno data96 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceVLBPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data522 mm
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 MB1536 MB ×4
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed10 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/s76.8 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLNone3.3
OpenCLNone1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 1993 25 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 800 nm 90 nm

Plex 2100 S4 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 153500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 789% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro and Quadro Plex 2100 S4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Ultra Pro is a desktop graphics card while Quadro Plex 2100 S4 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Quadro Plex 2100 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra Pro or Quadro Plex 2100 S4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.