GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data31.59
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameMach32TU104B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 January 1993 (32 years ago)29 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2944
Core clock speed10 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1095 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology800 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data80 Watt
Texture fill rateno data201.5
Floating-point processing powerno data6.447 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUsno data184
Tensor Coresno data368
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceVLBPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 1993 29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 800 nm 12 nm

RTX 2080 Max-Q has an age advantage of 26 years, a 819100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 6566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro and GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Ultra Pro is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Graphics Ultra Pro
Graphics Ultra Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 206 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra Pro or GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.