GeForce FX 5100 vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1555
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameMach32NV34 A1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 January 1993 (32 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed10 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45 million
Manufacturing process technology800 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.8
ROPs14
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceVLBAGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMDDR
Maximum RAM amount1 MB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone9.0a
OpenGLNone1.5 (2.1)
OpenCLNoneN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 1993 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 800 nm 150 nm

FX 5100 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 433.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro and GeForce FX 5100. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Graphics Ultra Pro
Graphics Ultra Pro
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5100
GeForce FX 5100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 46 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra Pro or GeForce FX 5100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.