GRID M60-4A vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated646
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.01
Architectureno dataMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameMach32GM204
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 January 1993 (33 years ago)30 August 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed10 MHz557 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1178 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology800 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data150.8
Floating-point processing powerno data4.825 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUsno data128
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceVLBPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 1993 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 800 nm 28 nm

GRID M60-4A has an age advantage of 22 years, a 409500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2757% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro and GRID M60-4A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Ultra Pro is a desktop graphics card while GRID M60-4A is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID M60-4A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra Pro or GRID M60-4A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.