Radeon R5 A255 vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro VLB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameMach32Topaz
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1993 (33 years ago)2014 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed10 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speedno data940 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology700 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data22.56
ROPs18
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceVLBPCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth80 MB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 700 nm 28 nm

R5 A255 has a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro VLB and Radeon R5 A255. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Graphics Ultra Pro VLB
Graphics Ultra Pro VLB
AMD Radeon R5 A255
Radeon R5 A255

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro VLB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R5 A255 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra Pro VLB or Radeon R5 A255, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.