GeForce 8400 SE vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro VLB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1482
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.25
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameMach32G86S
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1993 (33 years ago)1 August 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed10 MHz459 MHz
Number of transistorsno data210 million
Manufacturing process technology700 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.672
Floating-point processing powerno data0.02938 TFLOPS
ROPs14
TMUsno data8
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceVLBPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMDDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 MB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLN/A3.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 700 nm 80 nm

8400 SE has a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro VLB and GeForce 8400 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro VLB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 8 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra Pro VLB or GeForce 8400 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.