Radeon HD 7560G IGP vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameMach32Devastator Lite
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1993 (33 years ago)15 May 2012 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed66 MHz496 MHz
Boost clock speedno data760 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology700 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.16
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3891 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIIGP
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDRAMSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed83 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth664.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A11.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLN/A4.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 700 nm 32 nm

HD 7560G IGP has a 2088% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro PCI and Radeon HD 7560G IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Ultra Pro PCI is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 7560G IGP is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560G IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra Pro PCI or Radeon HD 7560G IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.