GMA X4500M vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro ISA

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameMach32Eaglelake
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1992 (34 years ago)1 October 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data80
Core clock speed10 MHz400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology700 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data13 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.064 TFLOPS
ROPs11
TMUsno data10

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceISA 16 BitPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDRAMSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed10 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A10.0
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLN/A2.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 700 nm 65 nm

GMA X4500M has a 977% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro ISA and GMA X4500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Ultra Pro ISA is a desktop graphics card while GMA X4500M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro ISA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 11 votes

Rate GMA X4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra Pro ISA or GMA X4500M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.