Apple M4 40-core GPU vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro ISA

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)no data
GPU code nameMach32no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1992 (33 years ago)30 October 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data40
Core clock speed10 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology700 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
ROPs1no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceISA 16 Bitno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDRAMLPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount2 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed10 MHz8533 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 700 nm 3 nm

Apple M4 40-core GPU has a 23233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro ISA and M4 40-core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Ultra Pro ISA is a desktop graphics card while Apple M4 40-core GPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Graphics Ultra Pro ISA
Graphics Ultra Pro ISA
Apple M4 40-core GPU
M4 40-core GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro ISA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 94 votes

Rate M4 40-core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra Pro ISA or M4 40-core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.