Apple M1 GPU vs ATI Graphics Pro Turbo

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)no data
GPU code nameMach64no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1995 (31 years ago)10 November 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8
Core clock speed40 MHzno data
Number of transistors1 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology600 nm5 nm
ROPs1no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMno data
Maximum RAM amount2 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed40 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth320.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 600 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 GPU has a 11900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Pro Turbo and M1 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Pro Turbo is a desktop graphics card while Apple M1 GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 17 votes

Rate Graphics Pro Turbo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 474 votes

Rate M1 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Pro Turbo or M1 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.