UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1009
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.54
ArchitectureGen. 4 (2007−2010)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameCrestlineGen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores824
Core clock speed500 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology90 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13.5 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012_1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) has an age advantage of 13 years, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 225% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 158 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 121 vote

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.