Radeon RX Vega XL vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Gen. 4 (2007−2010) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | Crestline | Vega 10 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 9 May 2007 (18 years ago) | 8 August 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 3584 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1630 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 13.5 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 365.1 |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 224 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1890 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 483.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10 | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 May 2007 | 8 August 2017 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 13 Watt | 225 Watt |
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 has 1630.8% lower power consumption.
RX Vega XL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and Radeon RX Vega XL. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega XL is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
