Radeon RX 560X Mobile vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated487
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.75
ArchitectureGen. 4 (2007−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameCrestlinePolaris 21
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)11 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81024
Core clock speed500 MHz1275 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1202 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13.5 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rateno data81.60
Floating-point processing powerno data2.611 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data64
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1450 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data92.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 11 April 2018
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 65 Watt

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 has 400% lower power consumption.

RX 560X Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and Radeon RX 560X Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Radeon RX 560X Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 163 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 444 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 or Radeon RX 560X Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.