ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated803
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.13
Power efficiencyno data0.84
ArchitectureGen. 4 (2007−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameCrestlineR700
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)12 August 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$550

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8800 ×2
Core clock speed500 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistorsno data956 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13.5 Watt286 Watt
Texture fill rateno data28.00 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data1.12 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data16 ×2
TMUsno data40 ×2
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB ×2
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data115.2 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 12 August 2008
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 286 Watt

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 has 2100% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 4870 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 64% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and Radeon HD 4870 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4870 X2 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 163 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 47 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4870 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 or Radeon HD 4870 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.