ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 4 (2007−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameCrestlineRV635
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)22 November 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8120
Core clock speed500 MHz796 MHz
Number of transistorsno data378 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13.5 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rateno data6.368
Floating-point processing powerno data0.191 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data396 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.67 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 22 November 2009
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 65 Watt

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 has 400% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 4570 Rebrand, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand
Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 162 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 or Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.