Quadro P620 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated524
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.97
ArchitectureGen. 4 (2007−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameCrestlineGP107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)1 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8512
Core clock speed500 MHz1177 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1443 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13.5 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data46.18
Floating-point processing powerno data1.478 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96.13 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 1 February 2018
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 40 Watt

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 has 207.7% lower power consumption.

Quadro P620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and Quadro P620. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P620 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 162 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 750 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 or Quadro P620, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.