ATI 3D Rage II vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 4 (2007−2010)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameCrestlineMach64 GT-B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (19 years ago)5 September 1996 (29 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$269

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed500 MHz60 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13.5 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data0.06
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSDR
Maximum RAM amountno data4 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data83 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data664.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX105.0
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 5 September 1996
Chip lithography 90 nm 500 nm

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 456% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and 3D Rage II. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 is a notebook graphics card while 3D Rage II is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 164 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 27 votes

Rate 3D Rage II on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 or 3D Rage II, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.