Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 5 Arrandale (2010)RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
GPU code nameGMA HDStrix Point
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 January 2010 (16 years ago)2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores121024
Core clock speed500 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2700 MHz
Number of transistorsno data34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rateno data172.8
Floating-point processing powerno data5.53 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cacheno data8 MB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataLPDDR5X
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+no data
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x USB Type-C

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU has a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU
Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 146 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 16 votes

Rate Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics or Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.