Radeon RX 6700M vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.16
ArchitectureGen. 5 Arrandale (2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGMA HDNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 January 2010 (15 years ago)31 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores122304
Core clock speed500 MHz1489 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt135 Watt
Texture fill rateno data345.6
Floating-point processing powerno data11.06 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L0 Cacheno data576 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB
L3 Cacheno data80 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data10 GB
Memory bus widthno data160 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics 298
RX 6700M 66973
+22412%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2010 31 May 2021
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 135 Watt

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics has 285.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6700M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and Radeon RX 6700M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 6700M
Radeon RX 6700M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 146 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 131 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics or Radeon RX 6700M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.