Radeon RX 6500 XT vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated271
Place by popularitynot in top-10067
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.25
Power efficiencyno data16.54
ArchitectureGen. 5 Arrandale (2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGMA HDNavi 24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 January 2010 (16 years ago)19 January 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores121024
Core clock speed500 MHz2610 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2815 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt107 Watt
Texture fill rateno data180.2
Floating-point processing powerno data5.765 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2248 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data143.9 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics 298
RX 6500 XT 76445
+25596%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2010 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 45 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 107 Watt

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics has 205.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6500 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and Radeon RX 6500 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6500 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon RX 6500 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 146 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 3866 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics or Radeon RX 6500 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.