ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 5 Arrandale (2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGMA HDRV710
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 January 2010 (15 years ago)30 September 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280
Core clock speed500 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data242 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.096 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data650 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data10.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2010 30 September 2008
Chip lithography 45 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 20 Watt

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 22.2% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 4350 AGP, on the other hand, has 75% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and Radeon HD 4350 AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4350 AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP
Radeon HD 4350 AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 146 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4350 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics or Radeon HD 4350 AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.