GeForce RTX 5060 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated71
Place by popularitynot in top-1002
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data99.85
Power efficiencyno data26.43
ArchitectureGen. 5 Arrandale (2010)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGMA HDGB206
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 January 2010 (16 years ago)19 May 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores123840
Core clock speed500 MHz2280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2497 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rateno data299.6
Floating-point processing powerno data19.18 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data120
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cacheno data3.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics 298
RTX 5060 121801
+40842%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2010 19 May 2025
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 145 Watt

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics has 314% lower power consumption.

RTX 5060, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and GeForce RTX 5060. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 5060 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 146 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 7792 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics or GeForce RTX 5060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.