UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 599 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Gen. 3 (2005) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
| GPU code name | GMA 950 | Alder Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 March 2005 (20 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4 | 64 |
| Boost clock speed | 250 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 12_1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 March 2005 | 4 January 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen). We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
