FirePro S9300 X2 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 3 (2005)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGMA 950Capsaicin
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2005 (21 years ago)31 March 2016 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44096 ×2
Core clock speedno data850 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data217.6 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data6.963 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data64 ×2
TMUsno data256 ×2
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB ×2
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.0
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2005 31 March 2016
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 300 Watt

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 has 4186% lower power consumption.

S9300 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 83 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 8 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 or FirePro S9300 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.