ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1463
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.23
ArchitectureGen. 3 (2005)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameGMA 900R423
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2005 (21 years ago)1 March 2004 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4no data
Core clock speedno data520 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data160 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data63 Watt
Texture fill rateno data8.320
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data560 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data35.84 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data9.0b (9_2)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2005 1 March 2004

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 and Radeon X800 XT Platinum. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X800 XT Platinum is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 20 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon X800 XT Platinum on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 or Radeon X800 XT Platinum, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.