Apple M1 GPU vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900
Contents
Share:
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Gen. 3 (2005) | no data |
| GPU code name | GMA 900 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 March 2005 (21 years ago) | 10 November 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4 | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | 400 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 5 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | - | + |
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
