UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 743 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
| GPU code name | GMA 600 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 May 2010 (15 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1450 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 14 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c | DirectX 12_1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2010 | 30 March 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
